Ultimate Bengals vs Green Bay Packers Match Player Stats

When fans search for Bengals vs Green Bay Packers match player stats, they want quick answers with real context. Who dominated? Which plays mattered? What do the numbers actually reveal?

The October 10, 2021, overtime thriller delivered all the drama, explosive plays, clutch moments, and five missed field goals that kept it tied longer than expected. Green Bay won 25-22, but the stats tell a deeper story about two teams heading in different directions.

This breakdown gives you the complete picture. Quick stats when you need them. Deep insights when you want them. Everything is organized so you can find exactly what you’re looking for.

Understanding Bengals vs Green Bay Packers Match Player Stats Beyond the Box Score

Raw numbers need context to make sense.

A completion percentage means nothing without knowing if the quarterback faced pressure or worked from a clean pocket. Rushing yards change meaning based on game script—protecting a lead versus chasing points creates entirely different situations.

This matchup mattered. Cincinnati was proving they belonged as AFC contenders with Burrow healthy. Green Bay was riding Rodgers through another MVP campaign. The game flow—with five combined missed field goals—gave both offenses extra possessions that inflated volume stats while revealing who performed under sustained pressure.

Game Snapshot and Critical Context

Final Score and Overtime Drama

Green Bay 25, Cincinnati 22 (OT)

Regulation ended 22-22 after both teams traded scores in the fourth quarter. Cincinnati forced overtime with a late touchdown drive, showing Burrow’s clutch ability. Green Bay received the OT possession and methodically moved into field goal range, where Mason Crosby connected after missing three earlier attempts.

Five total missed field goals—three by Crosby, two by Cincinnati’s Evan McPherson—prevented either team from pulling away. Those failures extended the game and created extra offensive opportunities.

Conditions That Shaped Performance

The weather at Lambeau was mild—no environmental excuses. Both teams were relatively healthy, though Cincinnati’s offensive line was still building chemistry, which showed when Green Bay brought pressure.

Coaching matchup: Matt LaFleur’s established system versus Zac Taylor’s evolving offense. LaFleur used play-action repeatedly to create favorable matchups for Rodgers.

Complete Team Statistics Breakdown

Offensive Efficiency Comparison

Green Bay controlled yardage and clock, but couldn’t convert that into a comfortable lead. Cincinnati’s red zone efficiency (75% vs 40%) kept them competitive despite fewer opportunities.

Defensive Performance Metrics

Neither defense dominated. Cincinnati hit Rodgers six times with one sack. Green Bay hit Burrow twice with one sack. Real pressure came from coverage disguises, forcing a longer processing time.

Key Stats: Rodgers averaged 8.8 yards per attempt, Burrow 7.4—both well above league averages, showing secondary struggles on both sides.

Bengals vs Green Bay Packers Match Player Stats – Quarterback Duel Analysis

Joe Burrow’s Statistical Performance

Passing: 26/38, 281 yards, 2 TD, 2 INT (68% completion)

Burrow showed poise with a 68% completion rate against Green Bay’s disguised coverages. Both interceptions came when he anticipated one coverage but faced another post-snap—growing pains for a developing quarterback.

His strengths showed on third downs and deep balls to Ja’Marr Chase. Against a Packers defense allowing just 6.8 yards per attempt that season, Burrow’s 7.4 average was competitive. The two-minute drill that forced overtime showcased his clutch ability.

Aaron Rodgers’ Efficiency Masterclass

Passing: 27/39, 344 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT (97.6 rating)

Vintage Rodgers delivered consistent excellence. His pre-snap adjustments identified blitzes and exploited mismatches before the snap. The lone interception was a tipped pass, not a poor decision.

Over time, experience showed. Rodgers methodically moved Green Bay into field goal range with patient timing and accurate intermediate throws. His 97.6 passer rating fell right within his 2021 MVP season range.

Wide Receiver Battle and Receiving Stats

Bengals Receiving Corps Performance

Ja’Marr Chase: 6 rec, 159 yards, 1 TD (26.5 avg)

Chase’s explosive performance terrorized Green Bay’s secondary. His high speed forced safety help over the top after the first big gain, opening underneath routes for others. The touchdown came on a perfectly executed go route where Chase beat the corner and tracked the deep ball flawlessly.

Tee Higgins: 6 rec, 60 yards, 2 TD

Higgins dominated the red zone. His 6’4″ frame allowed Burrow to trust contested throws near the goal line. He won jump balls and used physicality to shield defenders.

Packers Receiving Leaders

Davante Adams: 11 rec, 206 yards, 1 TD

Adams put on a clinic, forcing Cincinnati into constant adjustments. He beat man coverage with route precision and found soft spots against zone. His 206 yards came from separation skills and yards after catch—breaking tackles and extending plays.

Allen Lazard: 2 rec, 13 yards, 1 TD

Modest stats hide situational importance. His red zone touchdown came when Cincinnati overcommitted to Adams, leaving Lazard open for an easy score.

Ground Game Analysis – Rushing Attack Stats

Bengals Rushing Performance

Joe Mixon: 10 carries, 33 yards | 59 receiving yards

Limited rushing numbers reflected the game script—Cincinnati trailed or stayed tied, forcing a pass-heavy approach. When Mixon carried, Green Bay loaded the box.

His receiving contribution (59 yards) and pass protection mattered more. Mixon picked up blitzers on several deep shots, including Chase’s touchdown. He provided safety valves on checkdowns that sustained drives.

Packers Running Back Contributions

Aaron Jones: 103 rushing yards, 40 receiving yards

Jones’ versatility kept Cincinnati honest. His 5+ yards per carry came from patient running—following blocks and accelerating through gaps decisively. This ground success set up play-action opportunities that Rodgers exploited repeatedly.

His receiving work turned short gains into longer pickups through elusiveness. Early-down efficiency kept Green Bay in manageable situations, avoiding obvious passing downs.

Defensive Player Stats and Impact Performers

Cincinnati’s Leaders:

• Logan Wilson: 11 tackles, led all defenders
• Jessie Bates III: 9 tackles, 1 crucial pass breakup, preventing a TD

Green Bay’s Impact:

• De’Vondre Campbell: 10 tackles, contained outside runs
• Jaire Alexander: Physical coverage on Chase disrupting timing routes
• Preston Smith: 1 sack, 2 QB hits, generating edge pressure

The pass rush was modest on both sides. Trey Hendrickson created consistent pressure without sacks, affecting Rodgers’ timing. Neither secondary locked down the opposing passing attack, creating offensive fireworks.

Special Teams and Game-Changing Moments

Five missed field goals defined special teams and altered game flow dramatically.

Mason Crosby: Missed from 36, 51, and 40 yards—uncharacteristic struggles costing nine potential points.

Evan McPherson: Missed from 57 and 49 yards—longer attempts but still prevented Cincinnati from extending leads.

Field position favored Green Bay slightly. Those five missed kicks extended the game, inflating volume statistics beyond typical regulation totals. Special teams failures kept a game close that yardage suggested should have favored Green Bay more comfortably.

Critical Game-Deciding Plays Statistical Impact

Turnovers: Cincinnati’s two interceptions gave Green Bay short fields, though they only converted one into points due to field goal failures.

Fourth-Down Decisions: Conservative approaches from both coaches—Cincinnati attempted one and failed, Green Bay attempted none.

Red Zone Efficiency: Cincinnati’s 75% touchdown rate versus Green Bay’s 40% represented the key difference. The Bengals maximized scoring opportunities when reaching prime real estate.

Advanced Metrics and Deeper Statistical Insights

Yards After Catch Leaders: Adams (~85 YAC), Chase (~70 YAC)

Contested Catches: Higgins won 4 of 5 contested targets, Adams won 3 of 4

Pressure Impact:

• Burrow under pressure: 45% completion, both INTs
• Burrow clean pocket: 78% completion, both TDs
• Protection quality dramatically impacted efficiency

Explosive Plays (20+ yards): Cincinnati 6, Green Bay 8—both offenses relied on big chunks rather than sustained grinding.

Fantasy Football and Betting Context

Top Fantasy Performers:

• Davante Adams: ~32 points (PPR) – WR1 week
• Ja’Marr Chase: ~27 points (PPR) – explosive boom
• Aaron Jones: ~21 points (PPR) – balanced production

Key Lesson: Target receivers with high yards-per-catch, not just volume. Chase’s 26.5 average turned six catches into elite production.

Betting Outcome: Game went OVER the total (~49.5 points). Green Bay covered as the slight favorites. Adams receiving yards OVER cashed easily.

Historical Context and Season Comparison

This game showcased Cincinnati’s emergence. They would reach the Super Bowl that season, validating the growth shown here. Green Bay’s reliance on Rodgers and Adams mirrored their entire 2021 approach—when both performed, they won.

Season Averages Comparison:

• Burrow: Slightly below his completion rate, similar yardage
• Rodgers: Maintained elite efficiency consistent with an MVP season
• Chase: Nearly doubled his season average yardage
• Adams: More than doubled his average, showcasing dominance

Conclusion

The Bengals vs Green Bay Packers match player stats reveal more than the final score suggests. Green Bay’s yardage advantage couldn’t overcome red-zone struggles and special-teams failures. Cincinnati’s explosive plays and superior red zone efficiency (75% vs 40%) kept them competitive despite fewer possessions.

Rodgers delivered experienced efficiency. Burrow showed developing aggression. Adams’ 206-yard showcase and Chase’s explosive 159 yards highlighted elite receivers dominating in different ways. The real lesson: stats need context—game flow, situational football, and individual impact matter as much as raw numbers.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which quarterback performed better statistically? 

Rodgers had better overall stats with 344 yards and a 97.6 rating. Burrow showed poise, but two interceptions against disguised coverages hurt his line.

Who had the best individual performance?

 Davante Adams, with 11 receptions for 206 yards, dominated throughout, forcing constant defensive adjustments.

Why were there so many missed field goals?

Crosby’s three misses were uncharacteristic in pressure situations. McPherson’s came from longer distances (57, 49 yards), though neither faced bad weather.

How did the running game impact the outcome? 

Jones’ 103 yards kept Cincinnati honest and set up play-action. Mixon’s limited production reflected a game script forcing a pass-heavy approach.

What key stats determined the overtime result? 

Green Bay’s 50% third-down efficiency sustained the OT drive. Rodgers’ accurate intermediate throws methodically moved them into field goal range.